Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 14:20

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Exclusive | New York to Build One of First U.S. Nuclear-Power Plants in Generation - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Earth’s oldest living creature unearthed—dating back 700 million years - The Brighter Side of News
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Who are your 5 or so favorite Quora people?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Buffett Donates $6 Billion in Berkshire Stock to 5 Charities in Annual Gift - Barron's
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Neanderthals Spread Across Asia With Surprising Speed—and Now We Know How - Gizmodo
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
ISS Research & Development Conference Cancellation - NASA Watch